I’ll try to keep this fascinating story brief.
Bank Wegelin (W) has been around for 270 years. In Switzerland, it is referred to as a “Private Bank”. There are dozens of Private Banks in the country (less every week).
Private Banks do private things and charge big fees. Up until four years ago, the Swiss Private Banks were doing private things for private clients from all over the world, including many US names.
The DOJ sued the big Swiss bank, UBS, over this private business. UBS folded when the DOJ threatened a criminal complaint. (UBS would have had to close all its US businesses had a criminal complaint prevailed.) It ended up costing the bank $780 large and, for the most part, the DOJ got the “names” it were after.
Having blown UBS to smithereens, the DOJ set its sights on the other Swiss Banks. It targeted eleven Private Banks. W was on the list.
Talk of a settlement, including big buck fines and the release of more "names", has been in the press for a few months. Treasury Secretary Geithner met with Eveline Widmere-Schlumpf (Swiss Finance Minister) in Davos last week. It seemed like progress was being made on the thorny problem of the private banks:
Widmere-Schlumpf:
“We’re hoping that we’ll reach an agreement with the U.S. within the next couple of months”
I was surprised when the non-USA assets of W were “sold” to Notenstein Private Bank on January 27. Notenstein is 100% owned by Raiffeisen Bank (R). This sale should have been a tip off that the conversation between Geithner and Widmere-Schlumpf was not as friendly and optimistic as the public comments suggested.
The Senior Managing Partner of W, Konrad Hummler (KH), commented on the sale of his bank: (Apparently he was surprised too)
KH was clear that the sale was a reaction to the pending DOJ hammer blow:“I never could have imagined that we, as owners of Switzerland’s oldest bank, would have ever considered selling”
“The extraordinarily difficult situation and threat to the bank brought about by the legal dispute with the US”.
With the non-US assets stripped out of W, the DOJ suit is functionally against a dead person.
Note: Wegelin had no physical assets in the USA. It did have a bank account in the US holding $16.2mm. That was seized yesterday. But that amount is peanuts. The DOJ wants much, much more.
There's an unusual part to this which I find curious. W had an ‘old school’ way of doing business. To give assurances to its private customers that the bank was solid, and their money was safe, the Board of Directors of W assumed personal liability for the affairs of the bank.
No one has lost a Franc in the account transfers from W to R, so it would appear that those directors are now free from any liability. However, the DOJ has named EXECUTIVE X as a plaintiff in the charges files yesterday. So it would appear that Konrad Hummler’s (KH) problems are not over.
It just so happens that KH is also the Chairman of the Neue Zuricher Zeitung (NZZ), an influential Swiss rag. KH has a long history in Swiss banking. He used to run Swiss Bank Corp., which he later sold to UBS. He was the former head of the Swiss Private Bankers Association. He was an adviser to the Swiss National Bank for seven years! (He lost that job in April, 2011 as the DOJ noose was getting tighter.) This guy is wired.
The DOJ might also pursue the former assets of W. This could be problematic. The timing (and the surprise) of the sale of W's non-US assets to Raiffeisen Bank (R) might have pissed off the folks at the DOJ. There are (unconfirmed) reports in the Swiss press that the sale price for W's non-US assets was CHF 700mm ($725mm). That might explain the actions DOJ took. That’s a lot of loot.
Will the DOJ go after R? This would seem unlikely. R has a very big presence in Switzerland. It is a retail bank with three million customers and branches all over. It is affiliated with Raiffeisen Bank International (RI). RI is a very big bank in Eastern Europe with 13mm customers . Of further interest is that both R and RI are part of Unico Banking Group.
This consortium includes the big Dutch bank, Rabo and also the French bank, Credit Agricole. Maybe I’m nuts, but I don’t see the DOJ messing with a hornets' nest this size.
I think the DOJ's steps yesterday were just “shock and awe”. This puts more pressure on the remaining Private Banks. The DOJ blew up W in a rather spectacular fashion. Other Swiss bankers in the DOJ's cross-hairs must be crapping in their pants. Many of them are gathering up client dossiers - and getting ready to write big checks.
The DOJ is like a Rhinoceros. It's not very good looking, and when it puts its head down and charges into the brush, it tramples anything in its way. Nothing can stop it.
This matter will come to a head pretty soon. If it doesn’t, the DOJ will knock off the next Private Bank on the list.
Fines will get paid. Names will be turned over. Some individuals will be prosecuted. The “names” have some explaining to do. At the top of this list is the good old IRS. Other interested parties will include creditors, wives, ex-wives, ex-wives’-lawyers, current-wives’-lawyers, business partners, employers, the press, relatives and friends.
After a while, this will all be forgotten. Sort of. The door for Americans to hide money away from the IRS is closed. Sort of. The foreign banks won’t want American customers; it’s too much of a hassle. If you do find a Banca di..... outside of the USA, you will have to plunk down a SS card, and agree to have info given to the IRS.
The door is closed for all electronic money. But the door is not completely closed. This story is as old as the Egyptians. Folks have been cheating their partners, wives and the taxman forever. It’s not likely to stop.
I understand that cash boxes are filling up with bills in some locations. In a zero interest rate environment, that makes some sense. Sort of. It makes infinite sense if rhinos are around.
On second thought, this episode will not be forgotten. Many people have already been trampled. More are in harm's way. Such is life. It has left a scar on the US image in some of the financial centers. The US played hardball and won. You don’t win many friends playing hardball. But this had nothing to do with friends. (Switzerland was once a friend of the USA.) It was always about the money.
There are many pieces of this story that would make for a good movie. For the life of me, I can’t figure out who are the good guys. Maybe that's the point.
Correction: After posting this I received a note from Raiffeinsen Bank International (RBI). RBI is not affiliated directly with Raiffeinsen Bank Swiss.
Both banks are members of the UNICO Banking group. That is the extent of their relationship.
The banks are cousins, but they are not brother and sister.
Sorry for the error.
bk
Posts
Two, four, six, eight! Who do we appreciate?
ReplyDeleteThe DOJ, Yeah!
"who do we expropriate?"
ReplyDeleteThere are other countries to put money, unusual for search and exotic. That said, gold and under pillow is only thing u can trust, even if its a lot of it.
ReplyDeleteCash in a box? How about gold in a box?
ReplyDeleteIt sounds to me like this might be a way for the Administration to get some dirt on Romney and his buddies for the election. Wasn't there something in the MSM the other day about his wife having a Swiss bank account that hadn't been disclosed?
Bruce you have to come over to Isaac Brock Society.
ReplyDeletehttp://isaacbrocksociety.com/
Its a website setup originally for "accidential i.e. People born in the US who came to Canada as children" US citizens in Canada who have never paid US Tax concerned about the implications of this crackdown. Its now a surreal experience of people moving their assets from the big Canadian banks to smaller credit unions that only do business in Canada. Supposedly there are almost a million people in Canada that have some type of US descent most of whom have never paid US tax. People though think that because credit unions are member run people can use their influence as members to force management never to give into the US. No I personally don't think the US is going to get into a huge fight with Canada over this but we do live in surreal times. Increasingly there are now people joining the site from all of the world including in Switzerland and much of Europe to discuss this issue. I have also been told that none other than Kashya Hildebrand who was born in the US may have "issues" in this department.
While my German is not good the story supposedly leaked by Hildebrand's enemy's in the Swiss People's Party is that Kaysha doesn't file US taxes despite being born in the US and apparently a citizen and both Bank Sarasin(Sarasin has not been implicated in any of the current scandals) and the Swiss Federal Tax Administration know and approve of this situation. I have also heard indirectly from someone that they were told in two different Canton by Swiss tax officials that if the were a dual US Swiss Citizen not to file with the US if they were resident in Switzerland.
ReplyDeleteWhy wouldn't a bank that has no dealings in thje U.S. just tell the DOJ to go to hell where they belong? Or simply ignore them?
ReplyDeleteIn the words of Hillard: "The malignity that never forgets or forgives is found only in base and ignoble natures, whose aims are selfish, and whose means are indirect, cowardly, and treacherous.
ReplyDeleteThe IRS has no legitimate reason to force disclosures of foreign accounts (assets). The US federal government taxes income NOT assets. If a criminal investigation for money laundering, narcotics etc are involved its another matter and has been for some time. The current expedition is totalitarian control, like what happened to S. African whites, German Jews, and U.S. of Japanese ancestry under a prior Democrat dictatorship. Nothing more.
ReplyDelete