The prepared remarks were identical for both presentations. I reviewed Bernanke's 10/4/2011 testimony before the Congressional Joint Economic Committee (Link). There is something missing in the 2012 reports to Congress that was included in Ben's statement just a few months ago. Here’s what he said in October 2011 about inflation:
Longer-term inflation expectations have remained stable according to the five-year-forward measure of inflation compensation derived from yields on nominal and inflation-protected Treasury securities suggests that inflation expectations among investors may have moved lower recently.
So last October, Ben was touting up the TIPS/Bond spread as a confirmation that the broad expectation for inflation was very tame. In fact, when Ben made those comments in October he was right.
The five-year TIPs/Bond spread was at 1.60%, a very low rate of expected inflation. That's no longer true.
In his testimony to the Senate this week, Ben did not bother to mention that the TIPS spread has blown out since October. He eliminated any reference to the TIPS spread altogether. The reason? Simple, the TIPS spread is no longer telling Bernanke what he wants to hear, so he ignores it.
The following are some charts on the TIPS spreads. First the five-year:
Now the Ten-year:
At this juncture, I’m absolutely convinced that Bernanke is making a biblical mistake. Yes. it will cost Ben his job (and the Fed’s credibility) at some point. But the real consequence will be to Americans in general, and also a few billion people outside the borders.
There is zero evidence today that the US economy is in a crisis and that emergency monetary policies are justified. But Ben tells us differently. He omits critical information that would argue against his policies. I think his omission of the inflation information contained in the TIPs data is equivalent to lying, and he knows it. His disinformation makes all of his words to legislators (and the public) very suspect.
My conclusion is that Bernanke is prepared to manipulate data (and any other damn thing he can lie about) in an effort to make people believe he is doing the “right thing.” He’s not doing what is right for the country any longer. He's in the process of ruining it.
Ultimately, Bernanke will be proven wrong. The longer Bernanke’s emergency measures are sustained, the harder it will be to unwind the mess he has created. Another two years of ZIRP, Twist and QE will bring long-term economic problems to America. The history books will not look kindly on Bernanke and his speeches the past week. I expect they will say:
“The first weeks of February 2012 were the last chance the Federal Reserve Bank had to alter its stance. As of this date, the die was cast; the Fed committed to irreversible steps. The only variable left was time. Twenty-four months later the US economy lost its footings. And when it fell, it took a decade to find a bottom.”
Some say Bernanke is a hero, that he saved the global economy from collapse in 2009. I say that he is a goat, one that will bring us a generation’s worth of trouble. That he ignored ample evidence in 2012 that the economy had long since passed the Emergency Stage will be Ben’s undoing. He's so pregnant with his monetary policy that he can’t see (or just chooses to ignore) that the fire is out, the emergency is over, and his monetary policy should be in the process of normalization. That failure, will cost everyone, big time.
.




And yet the market loves ol' Ben...
ReplyDeletehttp://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-02-08/bernanke-led-economy-proving-critics-clueless-about-federal-reserve-policy.html
> monetary policy should be in the process of normalization
ReplyDeleteInteresting. So you're saying that by now the US economy could pretty well take an interest rate of, say, 4%, (the minumum which I'd say would qualify as normalization, though not overnight of course) without collapsing completely. Would not be a problem for the still insolvent banks, would not plunge the housing market again, would not spike unemployment again - correct?
But if so, then the crisis must +truly+ be over. In which case it should be back to business as usual, i.e. growth, both in GDP and credit. Ok, likely at a lower level than it used to be, but still: growth, and another business cycle starting up, albeit ever so slowly.
That would imply even Kondratieff Winters aren't what they used to be anymore.
It would also imply the staggering losses of the crisis must have been fully taken and absorbed by now, even though no one can point out where they've fallen and hardly any businesses have gone broke.
And finally the only relic from the crisis that's still actually around, those magnificent deficits - well, evidently Cheney was right after all: they just really don't matter. They just sit there on the sovereign balance sheets and will be dealt with in a distant future, if at all, since we can apparently print to eternity without serious consequences.
Somehow, I doubt it. And clearly even the perennial optimistic Ben doesn't believe normalcy came back without anyone noticing.
And by the way, why hasn't gold been crashing through last year's 1525 low, given that essentially all is going to be OK again?
at least at 4% savers actually get something or there savings so they have some money to spend!
DeleteBruce, thanks for your writings, they are always interesting.
ReplyDeleteHowever, I disagree with your prognosis of Mr. Bernanke's work and recitations: you can't eat the cake and have it at the same time.
Either you agree that the economy is in crisis, in which case it becomes debatable if his policies are right. But the reasons are clear, and since a democarcy doesn't really allow for any long term strategy, he uses the means at his end to achieve his goals.
Or you follow the path that all is well in the best of worlds, in which case his policies have little impact on the global economy, since the inflationary effect of the next bubble will trump any FED operation.
You got to choose!
Note: I believe FED policies are only logical part of the end game.
After writing my comments above, it suddenly dawned on me that perhaps another interpretation could be that the losses of the crisis have indeed mostly been taken - and have by now all ended up as deficits on those sovereign balance sheets? Anybody anywhere done the math on that explanation adding up?
ReplyDeleteIf so, it would imply the private sector, banks included, is by-and-large off the hook by now, which would be in line with your point that the crisis is over. However, that would still leave most, if not all, governments horribly vulnerable and setup to detonate at the next crisis.
More of a semantics thing, but considering that the Fed has been taking extraordinary measures for some time now to try to "manufacture" growth. Shouldn't they be in and around DEFCON 2? Until the bond market goes critical of course.... I'm a prior service Air Force wanker so I just wanted to make sure you had your DEFCON's straight. Love your work. Keep it up.
ReplyDeleteNice catch on the TIP data, BK. Trumpeting data when it agrees with you and ignoring it when it doesn't is SOP in Academia, and Ben at core is an academic.
ReplyDeleteNo one is as reckless as a man who thinks he knows what he is doing based on a past experience which may or may not be analogous to what is currently happening. I can just imagine BB saying to himself, "That bastard Greenspan cut the interest rates and it worked--how come it's not working for me?"
And you know that academics feel little remorse when their social projects fail in the real world; they just retreat to their ivory towers and tenure and pretend it didn't happen.
"A little learning is a dangerous thing."
-- Alexander Pope
I guess there are people who are doing well under Fed policies: UAW, GE, Warren Buffett come to mind....
ReplyDeleteDear Bruce,
ReplyDeleteas far as the US is concerned you might be right.
But it's us dimwits over here in Europe, that still can't get it "all together" and he's likely thinking of the wider arc.
Huge quantities have been plowed in to this morass , for if we go under the knock on effect will be bigger than a generation of problems you predict.
But what do I know?
The permanent open market operations are also designed to maximize implied inflation. They always buy the on-the-run and those nearly so for TIPS, but avoid the same for nominals.
ReplyDeleteBruce,
ReplyDeleteExcellent data again. Thanks for keeping us posted on so many aspects of the bond and FX worlds.
I agree with you that Bernanke is deliberately working hard to promote inflation. As Bill Gross told us about 4 years ago, the big elephant in the room is inflation.
At this point, the sovereign debts of the west are so large, that inflating our way out is the only strategy left with a small chance of working. (The corollary of course is that Bernanke believes that bondholders have not been punished enough yet.)
As far as the economy is concerned, the US is not out of the woods. When/if Europe crashes and burns, every nation will be sucked down with it. The main thing propping up the US stock market now is that many believe that Bernanke will come to the rescue, again and again.
Remember that tiny inconvenience that the US had a few years ago? You know, that, um, sub-prime mortgage thingy? Well, Europe easily has the potential to be 5 times bigger than the sub-prime crisis.
The central bankers of the world have very good reason to be afraid. I fear that we (the western nations) will be SOL in less than 2 years.
The global economy reached an equilibrium state in 2009 (the "new normal"). It looks like everything will be shaken up again, shortly. We will have to wait it out (with well-diversified portfolios) until the new equilibrium establishes itself.
We will only get inflation when the Fed raises interest rates. Right now, with low rates, the country is starved for cash flow, hence, little or no inflation pressure.
DeleteBruce, can you help me here?
ReplyDeleteI am not defending the Bernank; quite the opposite.
Doesn't the USA roll over a majority of our debt (where are those timetables located?) in the next three to four years? At that point new debt will be issued. Isn't it true that if rates rise that the interest on those new bonds leads to debt servicing headaches?
Any resources to hep me get a better handle on these types of issues would be appreciated!
Thanks Bruce; I always enjoy your contributions.
And thanks to Yancey Ward for turning me on to your blog!
The silent majority agrees. This whole monetary experiment will end in tears. For now we watch.
ReplyDeleteAt this juncture, I’m absolutely convinced that Bernanke is making a biblical mistake
ReplyDeleteLOL I think Revelation 18:17 says it best
" In one hour such great wealth has been brought to ruin"
God says, "for everything, there is a season". Economic Winter is coming because every policy decision the ChairSatan made was geared to help the elites of this world. Exponential math says Benny will be hauling arse on the hamster wheel just to stay in the same place.
DeleteThe dye is cast at this point based on all the decisions made the previous 30 years but especially the last 4+ years. You can't grow debt faster than GDP for decades without hitting the wall. As the song says, "turn,turn,turn". Put your track shoes on Ben.
This is the idiot that wants to protect the value of the US dollar by hurling currency out of helicopters.
ReplyDeleteThis is the idiot who chaired an economics department that continuously raised tuition by 3x the rate of inflation -- year after year, decade after decade
This is the idiot who testified under oath that the subprime contagion was well contained.
Ben Bernanke is simply unqualified, even if central economic planning hadn't been discredited before he escaped from academia.
Insolvent bankers still need to kiss Bernanke's inept @ss to get their welfare subsidies... why the hell is anyone else quoting this loser?
I love how ChairSatan is touting the PCE now for inflation in the system instead of CPI which had us pegged at 3% inflation during 2011. I hope the dumbass continues to talk his book because I'm in TIPS in a big way since ALL CBs have started printing like no tomorrow. Ben, you can't outrun exponential math dumbass, but you can make me a ton of money you lying sack of dog squeeze. Keep up the lying and cheating until I can transfer my profits to some shiney new things. Timing is everything, and I'm counting on Ben to be the scum that he is and provide all the bread and circus needed for the harp to come out and be stroked by ChairSatan in a loving way just like his idol Nero who was a Hell of a playa.
ReplyDeleteAnon @ 7:28:
ReplyDeleteTips - any investment in gold as well? Has moved upwards nicely for past # of years...
Any hard asset that you own and physically hold carries no counterparty risk although RE owned carries property taxes which if not paid, has kicked many a man from his home. Gold and Silver are perfect examples of no counterparty risk.
DeleteBen's actually creating a window of opurtunity in which to convert his helo-drop currency into something not paper. Thank you Ben. TIPS are a no brainer moving forward, as inflation is baked into the cake at this point. These fools are in a poker game against an ace player called EXPONENTIAL MATH that will kick all their arses.