Saturday, January 21, 2012

Will the Fed Bring Clarity or Confusion?

Next Wednesday, between 12:30 and 2PM, we will get a ton of new information to digest and analyze. The Federal Reserve will make a series of statements while unveiling  its new communication effort. A portion of the new information will be contained in the revised Summary of Economic Projections (SEP).

The Fed has worked long and hard on its new communication policy. The question is, “What will people think and how will the markets react?” I believe that there is a very good possibility that the Fed's plan will add to uncertainties regarding monetary policy. Contrary to its objectives, the new "openness and clarity" may end up causing the confusion.


The Fed will provide information regarding member's thinking on the future size of the Fed’s balance sheet (BS). This is critical. We might see a consensus view that the Fed’s balance sheet will grow another 25% over the next 18 months. That would bring this headline:

Fed Signals Another $1T Of QE
Stocks rise sharply. Oil, copper, gold see largest one-day rise in two years
TIPs spreads widen to 2.5%

We could just as easily get a consensus opinion that the Fed’s BS will remain unchanged for the foreseeable future. That would also be a shocker:

Fed Forecasts End of QE
Global stocks in broad retreat.
Next move is to tighten?

The Fed will provide information regarding its thinking on GDP, inflation and the timing of an increase in the Federal Funds rate (new info). This is all potentially explosive data. The Fed's most recent read (November) on the economy painted a somewhat upbeat picture. Almost all of the data since then has been on the positive side. While I doubt the Fed will signal that happy days are here again, it would appear likely that a +2.0% growth forecast for GDP is in the cards. How is the Fed going to square this (relatively) upbeat economic assessment with a loose monetary policy that is currently at biblical historic levels? The answer is, "It can’t".

Fed Predicts Improvement. To Keep Monetary “Pedal on the Metal”
Global Central Bankers Critical, OECD head says, “Reckless” 
Dollar in rout, Gold rises $65

For the Fed to continue ZIRPing, Twisting and QEing, it has to support the policy with a bleak assessment on the economy. A negative outlook is the only scenario that justifies maintaining, let alone expanding, the existing "emergency" monetary measures.

I think the Fed will hint that monetary contraction is in our future (about a year away, if not sooner). To me, the only circumstance that would avoid this conclusion is if the Fed were to come out with some decidedly disappointing expectations for growth and unemployment for the next 36 months. This too would make for headlines:


Fed Downgrades Expectations
Three More Years of Sub-par Growth

A downbeat assessment would influence the Congressional Budget Office (CBO). On January 30, the CBO will release its ten-year economic outlook. This is what they said a year ago:




The CBO forecasts for 2011 were off the mark. I think they will have to significantly downgrade their expectations for 2012 and 2013. The CBO numbers are the basis upon which long-term estimates for future deficits and the financial status of Social Security (and other big entitlement programs) are made. The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) uses these numbers to craft legislation for the White House.

I find it interesting that the forecast that would best serve Ben Bernanke’s desire to maintain and expand monetary policy is exactly the opposite forecast that the CBO “wants” to use in evaluating America’s macro economic outlook.

On Friday, Morgan Stanley’s David Greenlaw commented on prospects for the Fed’s announcements this week:

In sum, there seems to be some risk of significant market confusion next week.

At the end of the day, we’re concerned that market confusion next week could lead to an unintended tightening of financial conditions.

Mr. Greenlaw is assuming that the Fed will produce an economic forecast that will force a conclusion that further easing is off the table. We may get that. The alternative is that the Fed downgrades its collective assessment for growth, inflation and interest rates. Should it do that, the folks at the CBO will have to either scramble to adjust their own expectations, or face severe criticism for presenting a rosy view of the future while the Fed is singing a different tune.






What will we get next week? Will it be clarity?




Or confusion?














Either way, I can’t wait.





Note: This is a Banksy. What original oil painting is this from?

13 comments:

  1. This is excellent work. Thanks for the analysis.

    ReplyDelete
  2. "which Banksy?"
    Not this one...but it may come in handy for some future post
    http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/product/B004071XNM?ie=UTF8&tag=shopwiki-uk-21&linkCode=as2&camp=1634&creative=6738

    ReplyDelete
  3. Surely, this whole post does nothing but demonstrate the fundamental idiocy of central bank manipulation of interest rates. Even if one grants the basic premise that the central bank should act in a counter-cyclical manner (which I don't; interest rates should be determined by the availability of actual capital in the form of savings, not through government dictate), they have no ability to make an accurate analysis of what's actually going on now, much less guess about the future. As if 2005-2008 hadn't already made that abundantly clear! The whole activity is a snare and a delusion.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Central banks aren't here to serve you. Thet're there to serve their masters. Again, not you :)

      Delete
  4. very nice blog this is informative and impressive keep it up and best wishes for your future blogging career.........!!!!

    ReplyDelete
  5. I am no expert on paintings, but I've seen Bernanke enough to know that he is itching to launch QE3. Probably on MBS, to drive yields down even lower. What he completely misses though (poor chap!) is that with the much stricter standards for lending, it does not matter how bloody low housing loan rates are, much of the 99pc will simply not be able to be approved. Of course, equities will get another shot of highly sugared double espresso, and we could see the DOW rise to between 13-13.5K

    ReplyDelete
  6. Don't forget that the Federal Government has a vested interest in inflation. If you buy a 30-year treasury for $1000, at a 2% average inflation rate, you would lose half of the buying power of your $1000 by the time it matured; at an average 5% inflation rate, you would lose more than 75% of your buying power. If you buy shorter maturities, you receive less interest but suffer the same loss in buying power.
    Don't believe me, take out your calculator and multiply the original $1000 by .98 (or .95) and continue multiplying the product for 20 or 30 times and see the product constantly diminish (e.g., 980, 960.40, 941.19, 922,39, 903.92, 885.84
    The best time to buy Treasuries is when they are selling at a discount of at least 20% and paying more than 10% interest. Then you have at least a chance of saving your buying power.

    ReplyDelete
  7. ask the feds where is the 26 trillion they stoled this year from
    the us treasury. that they lost whatever crooks

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. FED = Treasury. Same ppl rotating between those two institutions. Get real plz.

      Delete
  8. Excellent post.Imho all we may expect from the Fed is more of the same, i.e. no QE3, but no tightening either. In any case: hedge your bets before that meeting.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The question is whether the 'no QE3' will also mean stronger dollar as it was with QE1 and 2.

      Delete
  9. Bombing Middle England

    ReplyDelete
  10. Bernanke has not changed in his personal crusade. Helicopter Ben will probably not go out without being ousted. And such madness is not understood by the man on the street, as it is too esoteric. But then ethnic cleansing was too esoteric to challenge in Germany too. In other words, playing God in all his market manipulations will end like Germany. Whether it is hyperinflation or whatever you want to call it, its results will be similar. It's eerie. As you say, "Either way, I can’t wait."

    ReplyDelete