Market Reaction
It is quite likely that we will see some interesting market action come Sunday night as this news is digested. But I will stick my neck out and say that once the dust settles a bit the ratings drop is not going to have a significant effect. (for now)
It looks as if the US is going to have a split rating. (AAA {equivalent} by Fitch/Moody’s and AA+ by S&P) If this were a high-grade corporate credit the split rating status would make no difference in how the underlying bonds trade. I doubt that the S&P action will have a different (lasting) consequence.
S&P Timing
What was S&P thinking when they pushed this on August 5th? Have they no sense of timing at all? We have just gone through the most gut wrenching market week in three years. This action could be very upsetting to global capital market conditions. While I think that is not going to be the case there certainly is risk for things to become unglued for a bit.
While I don’t fault S&P for their action (they said they would do this on April 18th) I think they made a big mistake with bringing public last Friday. For this, I would give S&P a single D rating.
The Rationale
We lowered our long-term rating on the U.S. because we believe that the prolonged controversy over raising the statutory debt ceiling and the related fiscal policy debate indicate that further near-term progress containing the growth in public spending is less likely than we previously assumed and will remain a contentious and fitful process.
My read of this is that they are blaming the politicians. As well they should. I hope that this is the message that comes to the public. It’s the idiots in D.C. that did this to us. They could not come to a compromise when the Nation required that they do so. The “Deciders” let us down. The economy will pay a price for what has happened. I truly hope that some of those Deciders pay a big price too. I think they will.
The Political Fallout
All of the big hitters in Washington have egg on their face today. But the one with the most egg is Tim Geithner. He said that a downgrade would not happen. It has. I think Geithner will have to go as a result. I think his “resignation” announcement will come before September 1st.
The Fed’s Response
Last night the Fed gave the S&P action a “We don’t care” response. There will be no change in how the Fed adjusts collateral requirements. There will be no change in their calculations of risked based capital for financial institutions.
It’s predictable that the Fed would take this position. What else could they do but ignore the downgrade? A key question is how central banks outside the US look at US collateral. Will any of them change the haircuts on US paper? I doubt it. But if I’m wrong and we see the Bank of Canada, England or ECB do anything regarding collateral ratios there will be hell to pay. That’s the best reason why they won’t do anything.
China/Russia Reaction
The Chinese downgraded the US some time ago. They don’t think so much of our paper. Russia is a big holder too. I would expect that we see evidence in the coming months that these two are going to be lowering their holdings. I don’t expect to see some big headline that says, “China to sell”. That’s not going to happen. The critical issue is, "Will they buy more?" I doubt they will.
The Russians must be jumping for joy at this. As this plays out we will see very clearly who are friends and who are not. On this issue, these two are not our friends. Yet they hold a total of $1.5 trillion of our paper.
On the Knock on Affect
S&P lists the entities related to the US that will have their ratings dropped. Fannie, Freddie and Ginnie Mae have been cut. Together that is about $6 Trillion worth of paper.
S&P has said that the ratings change for the US does not impact corporate ratings. But the states and cities are another matter. To me it's just nutty to think that the city of Syracuse is a AAA and the federal government is worth less than that. No doubt but that Muni downgrades will be forthcoming. This should have happened years ago.
Impact on Fed Policy
If I was a rating Agency I would look at the policies of the government as a whole when setting a rating. Clearly the federal government is running up too much debt and S&P has said, “No mas”. The rating agencies want to see saner and more sustainable policies from D.C. They do not want to see kick the can down the road stuff.
There is no greater “kick the can” policies than those of the Federal Reserve. They have cut interest rates to zero. A desperation policy that is leading to big distortions in the basic funding markets today. They have bought Trillions of government paper. They have facilitated the expansion of US debt. They are part of the problem when it comes to long-term fiscal sustainability.
If the Fed announces another LASP (QE3) I now anticipate that the rating agencies will react negatively. More QE = More downgrade. I hope Bernanke and his cohorts get this message. Their hands are now tied at so many levels. They are pushing their own limits on inflation targets. They know that ZIRP is a failure. They understand that QE (LSAP) has only marginal benefits (at best) and they also understand (and have acknowledged) that additional QE efforts now come with more risk than reward.
It would have been helpful if the S&P had provided some thinking on this critical issue. S&P was willing to take on the entire legislative part of government. But they didn't have the balls to take on the Fed. Interesting.
On Entitlements:
We have just a few months before the next explosion. S&P has put the US on a negative alert. Meaning further downgrades are going to happen if the US fiscal house is not put in better order.
Folks, that CANNOT HAPPEN without substantial cuts in both Medicare and Social Security.
So over the next few months when Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi tell us that there will be no cuts to these mega programs, respond by immediately shorting the stock market. If Obama sticks in the mud and says, “We will not cut SS” the Dow will fall 500 points.
This will be a gut wrenching process. The fate of the nation now rests on it however. Either these programs get contained in a meaningful way or everything we have come to know and love about this country will go into a two-decade collapse.
It was leaked
This article/chart from FTAlphahville makes the point that US long term rates had one of the biggest run ups in years yesterday. How did that happen? Easy. The info that S&P would make a move after the close was leaked. There are insiders all over Wall Street that got the "heads up". What kind of system is this?
On Vigilantes
Paul Krugman (and many others) have been pounding the table and pointing to the bond market and saying, “See! Rates are low! We have to issue more debt, not less! We have to spend more, not less!
On several occasions in the past month Krugman has made this point. He says there are no vigilantes in the bond market. Well there are vigilantes. They are not the tough guys who trade bonds for a living. They are the white shirt boys at S&P.
Face it Krugmans of the world. Keynesian economics has hit its limit. You can’t spend your way out of this problem. That door is now closed.
If there is a silver lining to the S&P action it is that mainstream economists on both coasts of the US (but not Chicago) have also been downgraded. The notion that Debt = Growth is now a dead concept. I couldn’t be happier.


'Tis but a bite of a tick on a brontosaurus.
ReplyDeleteI hope, against hope, that US and the west will stop spending and slowly learn to live within their means. But that sadly requires politicians to make monstrously hard choices and probably lose their "tenure" at the next vote.
If the worst comes to the worst the US (if it incorporates Canada, somehow) can strategically and resource wise survive. But here in Europe we'll continue to sing "la-la-la" whilst the whole edifice comes apart.
Perhaps that's too bleak, but I'm not optimistic
We fiddle with paper, while Rome is burning. None of these addresses the core issues that eat this nation away. Mere distraction.
ReplyDeleteSounds like you saying that the rating agencies are now setting Fed policy. Are these the same institutions that rated sub-prime trash AAA. I would like to see an investigation or two into their activities. Instead, we seem to be willing to curtail our sovereignty for some private unelected bunch of boys from Ivy Leagues with shady agendas and oversized egos. Why is that? Geez.
nice job
ReplyDeleteI see you picked out that phrase, "contentious and fitful process." That jumped out at me too. Someone with an old-school vocabulary wrote that, I think. You just don't see that kind of word usage, most of the time, these days. Someone over 50, I would bet. Someone who is just mad as hell and not going to take it anymore--and that, I think, explains the timing of the downgrade. Someone (or a group of people) thinking, "We have some leverage here and it would be irresponsible for us NOT to use it. And let the chips fall where they may." I like that.
ReplyDeleteI notice you say, "that CANNOT HAPPEN without substantial cuts in both Medicare and Social Security." Without wanting to be repetitious, I note that you are still not considering substantial cuts in a defense budget that is greater than the defense spending of all other nations put together (as I recall).
I say this as a pretty much generic pro-military right winger--there will be cuts in Defense spending. Substantial ones.
ReplyDeleteBut you can cut the military down to zero and we would still be spending more than we have. That's a measure of how bad the entitlement spending has gotten.
"But you can cut the military down to zero and we would still be spending more than we have."
ReplyDeleteWell, this is true:
US defense budget: $928.5 billion in 2011.
US deficit: $1,650 billion in 2011.
On the other hand, defense is the largest single category (24.4%) with health care coming second (23.6%), pensions third (20.7%), and welfare fourth (12.2%). I don't think the military should be exempt, seeing that very little "defense" spending is really for defense of the nation.
Charles P,
ReplyDeleteYou know I am not a militarist. You know that I hate the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.
We have something called OCO. (Overseas Contingency Operations). What us common folks call War.
These wars we are in cost us $400b a year. Wasted money in my view. (I assume you would agree)
But unless something else happens the OCO number falls sharply from now on. Military spending will fall to about 4% of GDP if this should happen.
I'm not sure what number we should have for military spending when we are not in a war. The answer is it has to be smaller than it is today, but nor should it be zero. Would you be happy if it was cut in half?
If so, you just cut the long term budget by 2%. That comes to about $300b per year. Now you must cut more. You have to come up with an additional 300-400b a year. That can't be done without touching SS or medicare. Its that simple (in my view).
Charles, I'm 61. I marched on DC in 69,70 and 71 in an effort to stop the OCO of my generation. I lost family members and many friends in that war. It turned me against the government for years.
I hate war. But I don't think the US can cut its military to zero either.
Fair enough, Bruce. We agree. The only part I don't understand is why cutting military spending in half would "cut the long term budget by 2%." If military spending makes up about one-quarter of annual federal expenditures, cutting it in half would surely reduce the annual expenditures by 12%, more or less. I think I am missing something here.
ReplyDeleteThe Federal government maintains a non-observance of what the people want: a restraint on using debt to solve problems. Will the government even look? even listen to the people? even reverse their Cheney thinking of “debts don’t matter”?
ReplyDeleteThe Tea Party activists were severely punished by Obama’s administration, not having even a word in edgewise; these patriots are also smiling today.
This is not just another media induced contention between radical Tea Party activists and conservative accountants at S&P. What is at stake is the very survival of the US economy, the nation’s defense and well-being. So, S&P’s timing was correct, as it was tied to the Obama administration’s raising of the debt limit, also the Federal Reserve chairman who weighs in on such decisions—to trump the will of the people.
canada goose coats sale online Denmark Canada, UK,
ReplyDeletegoose trillium parka jackets womens online sale Denmark Canada, UK,
goose freestyle vest sale online sale Denmark Canada, UK,
Goose Chilliwack Bomber online sale Denmark Canada, UK,
Canada Goose Mens Citadel coats online sale Denmark Canada, UK,
Canada Goose Expedition Parka sale online sale Denmark Canada, UK,
canada goose snow mantra parka Jackets online sale Denmark Canada, UK,
Canada Goose Yorkville Parka online sale Denmark Canada, UK,
Canada Goose Womens Chilliwack Parka online sale Denmark Canada, UK,
Canada Goose Womens Expedition Parka online sale Denmark Canada, UK,
Canada Goose Womens Kensington Parka online sale Denmark Canada, UK,
womens Goose Montebello Parka online sale Denmark Canada, UK,
womens Goose Solaris Parka online sale Denmark Canada, UK.