Googleanalytics

Tuesday, August 30, 2011

Government investment disaster in the works??

Update:

Solyndra has gone bankrupt. 24 hours after I wrote this article. This is a very big deal for Obama!

Link to the Bloomberg story on the bankruptcy (Link)

Read on for my thoughts re: Solyndra before this news:
.



Solar stocks have been a terrible investment over the past few years. Some of the big public names have been hammered.

FSLR = -65%
LDK = -88%
ESLR = -100%
SPWR = -88%

Bloomberg had a story today on this. The bottom line:

The solar-equipment industry is beginning a consolidation that’s already the biggest in at least two years as plunging prices for photovoltaic systems force weaker companies to team with competitors or close shop.

From personal involvement I can add a bit of “color” to the story. Both China Inc. and Euro Inc. solar panel manufactures are willing to provide 100% of the financing (including “soft” costs) for a viable project. What better evidence could you find that there is a very big imbalance of supply and demand?

The fundamental issue is that solar panels are a low tech. commodity product. It’s very difficult to make a buck when that is the case.

These points all lead me to wonder about a big company in this space, Solyndra. This is a private company. I don’t have any financials to look at as a result. Neither do you. But you should, this company is heavily indebted to Uncle Sam.

There was a big announcement at Solyndra the other day. I think that this is a sign of some problems. This from August 19th:




Mr. Gronet was the CEO and Chairman of Solyndra. He was also the founder. He is Ex AMD. When he left in 2005 he had money in his pocket. That (and some VC money) was the capital that got Solyndra going.

It sure strikes me odd that he would be leaving right now. There has been no replacement named. That strikes me odd too.

As I said, there are no current numbers to look at. Solyndra tried to go public back in June 2010. There was a “Red Herring” stock prospectus that was circulated. There was no interest in the deal so it got pulled ("Unfavorable market conditions" was the excuse given) The SEC registration statement (S-1) for the proposed deal was also pulled from the public.

What was in the prospectus was, no doubt, the real reason that investor chose to take a ‘pass’ on the deal. There were revenue/expense numbers for the nine months preceding the proposed deal:

Revenue: $58.8mm
Cost of Goods Sold: $108.0mm


That is an absolute complete disaster. This is a low margin business to begin with. At Solyndra they were losing 84 cents for every dollar of sales. Adding in SG&A and CapEx the losses and cash drain had to be very heavy.

Of course, that’s just me guessing. I repeat, there are no numbers on this company. And that is the crux of the problem. There should be numbers available to the public. After all, the company has been financed by the Department of Energy for years. To make it worse, the funding has come from the Treasury Department’s own private bank. The Federal Financing Bank. Solyndra’s out-standings with the FFB/DOE as of July totaled $530 million. The rates for these advances are clearly subsidized. Consider the interest rate on this $2.5mm loan.




The pattern of subsidized financing is also clear from the FFB reports from January through June 2011.



You would think that with all this money and all these question marks someone in D.C. would be looking into all of this. There actually has been an effort to uncover some facts. But it went no place at all.

On June 27th the House Energy and Commerce Committee held a hearing. On top of the agenda was Solyndra. Jeffrey Zients (Office of Management and Budget Deputy Director) failed to show for the hearing to discuss OMB's role in the Solyndra DOE Loan Guarantee process. He sent a letter saying he had a scheduling conflict. A scheduling conflict? Give me a break!

Of note were the comments by the Chair of the committee, Cliff Stevens (R-Fla) who said that if the OMB refuses to comply in the coming weeks he would issue a subpoena to force disclosure. While I’m not holding my breath for this to happen, a showdown on Solyndra is coming. Keep in mind that the Boss/Owner (Pictured with O) just took a powder a few days ago.
.
.


Side Notes:

From ABC news:
The loan guarantee, the administration's first for a clean energy project, benefited a company whose prime financial backers include Oklahoma oil billionaire George Kaiser, a "bundler" of campaign donations. Kaiser raised at least $50,000 for the president's 2008 election effort.

In one of those “twist of fates” you hear about; back in April of 2008 Senator Hillary Clinton exposed the Kaiser/Obama connection while she was battling the big O in the Arizona primary. Obama was running an ad that said:

“I don’t take money from oil companies or Washington lobbyists”

The Clinton campaign made a big deal of this and pointed squarely at George Kaiser and the fact that he was raising big bucks for O’s campaign.
.
.

12 comments:

  1. Bruce, as an aside re solar: we decided we wanted to have it installed this year... one of the means to more self-sufficiency in our minds.

    Bottom line: the solar company gave us an estimate of $20,000, a ten year warranty, and with the rebates (fed and local utility), it would take us 21 years to make it pay out. Our utility company has one-tiered pricing only and said, "If you want to feel 'green', then go for it, but saving $300/year doesn't sound like a good investment". On that we agree, and by then we'll be in our late 80's.

    ReplyDelete
  2. From the same FFB site, note that Tesla managed to get guaranteed loans at significantly better rates than Nissan and only a few bps worse than Ford. That might be the next "investment" disaster....

    ReplyDelete
  3. Absolutely sickening.

    Seattle Green Jobs Program Gets $20M, Creates 14 Posts

    Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011/08/29/seattle-green-jobs-program-gets-20m-creates-14-posts/#ixzz1WYZLZNHs


    "But Myers and others say the biggest problem with the program is government is trying to create a market that consumers don't want."

    Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011/08/29/seattle-green-jobs-program-gets-20m-creates-14-posts/#ixzz1WYZ2qH5u

    ReplyDelete
  4. Hi Bruce, a couple of things about your post. Gronet left the CEO post in July 2010. He was replaced by Brian Harrison, who previously was an exec at Intel. True, no replacement for Gronet has been named for his role as chairman of the board, but he hasn't been CEO for a while.

    Solyndra's S-1 prospectus for its shelved IPO is definitely still available to the public. A quick and easy search on EDGAR finds it.

    Rep. Stearns did indeed issue a subpoena to OMB over Solyndra documents in July. So if you're still holding your breath, you can exhale. Since the subpoena was issued, OMB and Stearns' subcommittee have met over the documents, but neither side is talking.

    I can point you to several business press articles on these developments.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Scandalous! Wont it be the ultimate insult if they had outsourced jobs .... back end corporate jobs ... to cheaper destinations with government money! Stimulus money gone, ipo gone and jobs gone! who is the winner then?!

    ReplyDelete
  6. SOLYNDRA SUSPENDS OPERATIONS http://www.solarfeeds.com/breaking-solyndra-suspends-operations/

    ReplyDelete
  7. Hats off to you Bruce. I've been bearish solar (via a specific stock, STP, Suntech) since fall 2009, and am beginning to wonder whether the time to go long may be approaching.

    With Solyndra going bankrupt and other players going through similar financial difficulties, I wonder if supply/demand dynamics will in time create a more favorable environment for the survivors.

    Your thoughts on the above, as always, would be appreciated.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Bruce - Have you ever looked at solar installation building permit data? One company does not make the market.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Dan Y
    The wash out in the industry that is now happening will be good for the survivors.

    Those survivors will be the low cost producers of this commodity product. That will be the Chinese....

    ReplyDelete
  10. Anon @9:53
    Solar installations are rising quickly due to the legislation re REC's. (renewable energy credits)

    What we have is too many suppliers. There is demand. But the competition of price from both Chines and German manufactures make it impossible to make money.

    With the collapse of Solyndra (and others) this will change.

    The story here is that the DOE/Obama/Solyndra are dirty. That was the story I was trying to tell. Not that solar is a dead end.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Solar energy has been hailed as clean energy but is a failure due to the oil industry. Hilary Clinton hinted at it when she exposed the Kaiser/Obama connection in her run for presidency. The solar energy industry has been severely hampered by lobbyist manipulation to make it an unprofitable product doable by leaving unworkable margins to work through government subsidies. Without the “planned failure” by bringing out expensive solar panels that do not cover costs, the industry would have worked harder to bring about a product that would have brought out the potential of solar power to be competitive with other energy sources. It is not hard to understand what is said here. Through its lobbyists’ efforts, if oil money had not interrupted car manufacturers to hamper Detroit, the car companies would have jumped into hybrids and other types of energy saving cars a long time ago, but such government meddling was allowed by the then President who was “in bed” with the oil industry.

    ReplyDelete