Googleanalytics

Friday, July 8, 2011

Apres moi - le Deluge

The debt ceiling talks have made all the interest groups come out to the forefront to defend and generally shout about what they consider important. I have seen some pretty insane logic put forth by one side or the other. We have guys like Paul Krugman screaming that we absolutely have to be spending more and running up the deficit/debt to Warren Buffet who thinks that the growth in debt should be limited to no more than 3% of GDP.

The problem is that EVERYONE is talking his or her book. I think very few are making any sense at all. An interesting example comes from Scott Hochberg (Strengthen Social Security Campaign) who wrote an article for the Huffington Post about illegal workers and why the country should not tighten up the E-Verify standards.

What possible reason could Mr. Hochberg give for defending the status quo where we have 8 million illegal workers in the country at a time of record unemployment? Answer: It would be a disaster for Social Security. I have a very difficult time with the idiocy of this position. To make matters worse Hochberg has his facts wrong. From the article:

E-Verify is a tool designed to prevent the employment of undocumented workers in the United States.

BK: This is correct.

E-verify would remove millions of taxpayers from the pool that pays into Social Security, thus weakening the solvency of the Trust Fund.

BK: This is where I go nuts. The argument put forward is that the illegal workers contribute to SS and that without them SS is bankrupt. Yes, that is true. Without illegal worker’s contribution SS would be in deep deep trouble today. But does that mean we have to sustain illegal workers? Some numbers:

Of the approximately 8 million undocumented workers, it is estimated that about two-thirds of them pay payroll taxes into the Social Security Trust Fund, accounting for $12 billion in 2007.

Undocumented workers have contributed somewhere between $120 and $240 billion to the Trust Fund, accounting for 5.4 to 10.7 percent of its total assets.

The numbers used here come from a very significant source, the head of SSA, Mr. Goss. I wrote about this when he first made the remarks last September (link).

Note: I think the numbers have to be higher than what has been indicated by Mr. Goss. If the number is (only) $12b in 2007 it implies that the average earnings of the illegal workers is less than $20,000 per year. I think it is closer to $35k, which would put the annual number for improper tax receipts closer to $20 billion annually!

The article goes on to describe how serious things would be if we did not have the illegal workers contributing to the till:

According to the chief actuary of SSA, without the contributions of undocumented workers, the Trust Fund would run out of assets six years earlier than estimated in the 2010 Trustees Report.

BK: I think it would be much more than six years. If SS backed out all of the illegal contributions that have been made it would be busted today.

Here’s the sentence that took me over the top:

Any undocumented worker that pays taxes provides a net gain to the system (since they don't collect benefits).

BK: This is complete and utter bullshit. I don’t know if Mr. Hochberg is lying to us or if he is just ignorant of the facts. The reality of this crazy situation is that illegal workers who contribute to SS have the same rights as any natural citizen to receive retirement or disability benefits. The only difference is that the illegal worker MUST receive their monthly benefit checks outside of the country. One ex SS worker clarified these facts at the Angry Bear blog. Her words:

I was the manager of the SS office in Northern Santa Barbara County.

Once a person returns to his country of origin, s/he may apply for SS benefits and receive them abroad at any American embassy or consulate. He just can't receive SS benefits inside the US. This is well known and is commonly done. Also, even if the worker never receives a dime in SS benefits, his wife/widow and any children legally here can receive benefits. SSA has a large component which processes such claims.

BK: I promise you this is correct. I have independently confirmed this. If an illegal worker pays into SS for the required number of years, they get benefits. Period. Mr. Hochberg is flat out wrong on the facts.

Consider the lunacy of the position taken by the defenders of Social Security. Another way to state their position could be:

We consider Social Security to be the number one priority in the country. We think that no changes should be made to this system regardless of all of the evidence that it is now out of control. We choose to ignore the laws of the land when it comes to illegal immigration. We choose to ignore the consequences to the unemployed in America that illegal workers are contributing to. We think if we keep up the status quo (where 8 millions workers contribute hundreds of billions of illegal tax receipts) Social Security will be able to keep the checks going a few years longer. We are prepared to lie about the facts to achieve our ends. We don’t give a damn about fairness. We are defending our narrow interests. We don’t care about the huge inter-generational transfer of wealth that SS is bringing us. Our narrow goal is to protect the interests of the Boomers. Our motto is:


(Louis XV)

BK translation: After I’m dead things can go to hell.

Excuse the rant.


5 comments:

  1. Hello Bruce: I think a person who contributes to SS and gets benefits is not undocumented. I think undocumented employees become employees by using a 'borrowed' SS from another person. Is it then true, if this is the case, that the other person will receive benefits he or she were already entitled too, regardless of the additional contributions by the 'borrowing' contributor? This is the situation I face every day as a small business owner. Regards

    ReplyDelete
  2. Bruce ... the thing that people ignore/forget/blow-off is the fact that the poor do not pay for themselves. That's why people who make less than $50,000 don't pay any income tax.

    The whole grow our way out of this mess idea is complete nonsense.

    It is kinda like the Internet bust ... "we don't need no stinkin revenue to make money" ... every deal must stand alone.

    Gee ... I'm getting tired of the greater fool theory being proven wrong (right?).

    You want to fix America ... get rid of the competitive advantage that Washington has bestowed on corporate America which has no fiduciary responsibility.

    Moral Hazard isn't quaint.

    Give me a Law and Order candidate in 2012. I don't give a hoot what they think about any of the social wedge issues.

    We need saving from the criminal and incompetents

    ReplyDelete
  3. You failed to note Mr. Hochberg's title (researcher, of course). If I'm keeping score correctly, elements of the left are willing to a) let Warren Buffett continue to receive benefits, b) run a cruel Ponzi scheme at the expense of illegal immigrants, c) torture the arithmetic--in order to avoid touching our Social Security system. Anyone understand this bizarre juxtaposition?

    ReplyDelete
  4. Earned Income Tax Credit?

    DSK's Guinean sex partner is apparently another diversity immigrant implicated in EITC fraud.

    A major point is that any "immigrant" collecting EITC by filing a Form 1040 Schedule C to document self-employment income has their FICA paid for them - with zero cash contribution from them - by Uncle Sucker and his native born victims. iow their "contribution" to the SSTF comes from more general budget deficit spending.

    Deep Blue Lie Machine apparatchiks like Hochsberg then crank up and say "See? Look at all the FICA these hardworking immigrants paid!"

    However, paid propagandist Scott Hochsberg of the Strengthen Social Security Campaign is a a salient point relevant to "deficit reduction" via "revenue enhancement":

    501c3 reform.

    This definitely has to be "put on the table" along with all other options. And it must not be applied equally. I'm prepared to give until it's complete agony. To begin with, all religious institutions should immediately be placed on the Mark 12:14-17 program at all levels of government. There is good reason to believe religious deductions and exemptions violate the First Amendment.

    Ditto for all other so-called "public policy non-profits", including Scott Hochsberg's employer.

    And we need to explore large one-time capital levies on endowments. This is in addition to eliminating the bulk of all "charitable" tax deductions and exemptions.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Three career paths in politics come to mind and Hochberg being of the second type. The first path is of the war-monger whose deeds and words will force; he dominates. In economic life, he wills a dependency of his making. Marx, Cheney, Stalin comes to mind. On Cheney’s path, after his vice-presidency to profit handsomely from the Iraq War, his next stop was for his former military company to move overseas to avoid taxes.

    The second path is of the carnal minded man. Colton says of baseness, “There is a law of forces which hinders bodies from sinking beyond a certain depth in the sea; but in the ocean of baseness the deeper we get the easier the sinking.” Obama said, “I love my country” but his words are hollow sounding as we all watch the country sinking. This second type does not even try to grasp or has the discipline to seek higher truths, but he ignores facts, numbers, morality and history. Rather, he wallows in his own shallow-pan self-opinion, self-conceit, self-deceit, self-proclamations of a savior and some kind of harbinger of “change, real change, change you can count on.” Or, in Hochberg’s case: he is saving Social Security. Of the second type: Obama, Hochberg and members of the Supreme Court come to mind.

    The third path is of those men in tune with their higher mind and the realms of perfection where eternal truths, unconditional love, joyous nation building and where heavenly frequencies are constantly beaming. This politician lives for being in resonance with the frequencies of absolute good and virtue, not sickening vibes of a selfish ego (You know like my friend says: when Obama comes on TV, I have to turn it off!) The third type works for “a nation that shall come under God to have a new birth of freedom, and that government of the people, by the people, for the people that shall not perish from the earth.” (excerpt taken from the Gettysburg Address.) Of the third: Abraham Lincoln, the Founding Fathers, Ron Paul comes to mind. At present, America is mostly or only run by the second type.

    ReplyDelete