Googleanalytics

Thursday, June 30, 2011

On Crooks and Crooks?

This guy’s a crook and he’s going away for a very long time. His sentence will be announced tomorrow. He’s looking at 50 years. This is Lee Farkas. He was the boss at Taylor Bean & Whitaker (“TBW”). Farkas and some of his pals at TBW have been convicted of $3b in mortgage fraud.

This is a very nutty story. For me, the Farkas conviction is a sideshow. What I want to know/understand is how some of the biggest players in D.C. were involved in this mess.

Bloomberg has a detailed recap of the story. (Link). My take and some of their cuts:

This all started way back in 2002. TBW was doing big mortgage business with Fannie Mae. And guess what? Fannie determined that TBW was selling phony loans. Fannie accused TBW of fraud. They looked at specific mortgages and concluded:

A public records check revealed that the named borrowers didn’t hold title to the real estate and that the mortgages sold to Fannie Mae had never been recorded, according to the Fannie Mae document.

In 2008 a Fannie Exec said this about the events of 2002:

Our conclusion was that fraud, if I can use that word, had been perpetrated on Fannie Mae, and we considered that to be a very, very serious matter.”

As a result of the fraud Fannie stopped doing business with TBW. But they had a side deal to keep that quiet. Why? Because the disclosure would hurt the mortgage pool. Unbelievable!! From a court document:

Fannie Mae wanted to preserve the value of the servicing portfolio, which would plummet if it reported that Taylor Bean was selling bogus loans.

So after Fannie sneaks out of this dirty deal, who steps into the trap? None other than those idiots at Freddie Mac: (from the Bloomberg story)

At Freddie Mac, the decision to boost purchases from Taylor Bean was made by David H. Stevens, then a senior vice president of mortgage sourcing.


This insanity led to the $3b ultimate fraud. How could this have happened? Fannie knew that TBW were crooks. They must have been laughing in the halls when their archenemies at Freddie picked up where they left off. Who was in charge of Fannie at the time? Who was it that failed to notify ANYBODY of mortgage fraud? None other than Franklin Raines.

So what does are boy Frank have to say about the events that took place in 2002? Unbelievable!

“I have no memory” of the Taylor Bean matter.”

This just might be one of those cases where water boarding might be justified. He has no memory of such a significant event? Not possible.

Fannie and Freddie were regulated by OFHEO in 2002. Armando Falcone was running the place at the time. He was a Clinton holdover. I’m not sure what role he played in this. I find it impossible to believe that the “Top Cop” of the GSEs was not aware of the history of TBW. I think he tried to force the issue and got fired for his efforts.

On 2/25/05 this notice of a new requirement for the GSEs to disclose any evidence of fraud was published in the Federal Register. Falcone was behind this disclosure effort. He had to have something in mind.



Six weeks later Falcone was forced to resign. He wrote a letter to Bush.


 
I wonder if this sentence was a hint of what he was thinking:

I expect Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac will ultimately emerge as more effective and responsible government-sponsored enterprises.

I take this to mean that he did not consider Fannie and Freddie to be either effective or responsible. He knew they were rotten.

So who takes up OFHEO in 2005? Does it surprise you that it is George Bush’s lifelong friend (and school mate) James B. Lockhart?

Consider the circumstances. Lockhart comes in over the fraud disclosure issue. He must know that this is the hot button. It’s the reason he has the job! Does he do anything about it? Is he not aware of what happened with TBW and Fannie? Is he not aware that Freddie is buying billions in loans from TBW?

Lockhart does nothing and the opportunity for massive fraud on the people has been assured.


Now consider the role of a central player in all of this. David Stevens. He was the SVP at Freddie that made all of this happen. He left Freddie in 2005. Right at the time that Falcone was pushing for fraud disclosure. David had a fine career at Wells and Long and Foster where he continued to be a big shot in the mortgage industry. His chance to really shine came in 2009 when he was appointed head of FHA:










So what does our boy David do less than two months after taking on this big job? He blows up TBW:


David had to know all along that TBW was dirty. Give the guy some credit. Back in 2002 he gets a call from TBW where 100% of the new business is being offered to him. He knows that TBW is a big customer of Fannie, but he never asks why the switch? Not in a million years.

Mr. Stevens just got another big job. He’s out of government, but he hasn’t left D.C. Today he is running the Mortgage Bankers Association.

Quite frankly, this whole story makes me want to puke.


9 comments:

  1. But What do I Know?June 30, 2011 10:41 AM

    Nice takedown, Bruce, while at the same time it makes me want to puke, too. (The Germans must have a word for that sensation.) Looks like Stevens threw his old buddies under the bus when he took over the FHA and had to look tough. Must have agonized over that decision for all of four or five seconds. . .

    ReplyDelete
  2. Chance You TakeJune 30, 2011 1:40 PM

    Oh yea, its sickening all right. Really good job sewing this all together.

    Bowing to the collective street expertise on this blog, let me just ask: is it incorrect to say that the Bush Administration made repeated attempts to reform Fannie & Freddie? Is the history chronicled here accurate? (http://elenaives.com/attempts-president-bush-reform-fannie-mae-freddie-mac/). I believe it is.

    And how is it possible that Raines went from the Clinton OMB, to Fannie Mae, walked off with close to $90 million in compensation in 5 years, and then had to resign because of accounting "irregularities". (It was later determined that on jis watch, earnings had been overstated by 6.3 billion) In 2006 suit was brought against hims and two others for a total of $225 million (ouch!), but they settled it for just $3 million. No problem though - that tab was picked up by Fannie's Insurance company. Raines went on to advise Obama in the 2008 election.

    And then remember Jamie Gorelick? She was Clinton's genius Deputy AG that insisted on the firewall that prohibited the CIA and the FBI from sharing information. If it hadn't have been for that, we might very well have stopped the 911 attacks. (I lost friends in the Towers that day - I bet you did too.) That good work was rewarded with an appointment to the Vice Charmanship at Fannie. After 5 years and $26 million in compensation, she too resigned because of accounting "irregularities". It was later determined that she received close to $800,000 as a result of falsified financial transactions. Ms. Gorelick is now being touted as a potential Obama Supreme Court nominee.

    While we're looking back, can we say that Barney Frank, Maxine Waters, Gregory Meeks, Chris Dodd and lots of other political types (mostly dems) facilitated these frauds? Was I dreaming when I heard Waters praising Franklin Raines, or Frank explaining that there was no crisis? How is it with all the draconian regulation imposed on your industry over the last several years, Fannie and Freddie are exempt? Doesn't that make you ill too?

    I'd like that deal: privatized profits and socialized losses. Sure, it will eventually topple the whole capitalist structure that has done so much for so many, but sometimes I think that's the point.

    I like this blog because I find it a unique take on "the financial issues of the day", and I always learn a lot. (My expertise is political, not financial). Clearly, guys like Farkas are bad actors, but I think of them as soldiers, not capos. The worst corruption is spreading from the apparatchik class on the banks of the Potomac: the cops themselves are the bigger crooks...

    ReplyDelete
  3. Chance you take:

    I think Bush was hell bent to stimulate housing and thus the economy. I think Lockhart knew how big the problems were with sub prime.

    And yes he is on record saying the GSEs needed reform.

    But look at the balance sheet of the GSEs during the Bush years. They went vertical after 2005.

    Here is an excerpt from a Bush speech from June 2002. You tell me what he was thinking of back then

    -I called upon the private sector to help us and help the home buyers. I'm proud to report that Fannie Mae has heard the call and, as I understand, it's about $440 billion over a period of time. Freddie Mac is interested in helping. I appreciate both of those agencies providing the underpinnings of good capital.

    -Economic security at home is just an important part of -- as homeland security. And owning a home is part of that economic security.

    Note that he thinks of F/F as the private sector. He knew better. Can you tell me just what the heck, "good capital" is??

    I wrote about this in April of 2009:

    http://brucekrasting.blogspot.com/2009/04/mortgage-mess-blame-bush.html

    I agree with you that B.Frank and many others are dirty in this. I like your line:

    "the cops themselves are the bigger crooks..."

    I'll use it.
    bk

    ReplyDelete
  4. Bruce,

    Thanks for giving us the dirt...bubble are easy to find on static media....I wish you and your family a happy 4th of July weekend..

    you rock..

    ReplyDelete
  5. Chance You TakeJune 30, 2011 9:58 PM

    Bruce,

    I read your post from 2009. Very strong argument, very articulate. I must have been absent that day.

    I don't think there is any doubt that Bush was doing all he could to expand home ownership. I think it was thought of as an apple pie and mom kind of universal American goal. Remember the "opportunity society"? I like that, I was (and am) all in favor of that. I think he was trying to roll with the prosperity rolling out of the end of the 20th century decade - the right wing version of redistribution...

    As far as what "Good Capital" is, I have no clue. Maybe we are just misunderestimating the strategery...

    Have a great 4th

    ReplyDelete
  6. In driving into a ghost town, there are signs that industry has left; the buildings stand vacant and rotting. That’s normal. Today, housing has been divorced from industry, having been propped up by taxpayer subsidies, government loans, special laws and by congressmen whose priority is to prepare for the next election to get votes.

    Look into the future? On the one hand, the government is focused on housing and on the other hand, it pays no attention to jobs going overseas or that industry is what determines the success of housing. Most people want a government to protect the people from business sharks. But here we have in the place of our industries determining housing, we have a government playing God, and with the same cast of characters moving in and out of the government’s revolving door. From top to bottom, from lawmakers to crooks—all are feeding off the fat of the land. Go and puke!

    ReplyDelete
  7. Hello,
    When I design custom invitations, I offer to design custom postage for my clients to complete the look of their invitation package. The party starts when the guests open their invitations, so setting the tone of the party with the invitation is important. But even before the envelope is opened, the first impression the guest has of the invitation is what’s on the outside.

    ReplyDelete
  8. cheap goose jackets online sale Denmark Canada, UK,
    goose trillium parka jackets online sale Denmark Canada, UK,
    Canada goose freestyle vest online sale Denmark Canada, UK,
    Canada Goose Chilliwack Bomber sale online sale Denmark Canada, UK,
    Canada Goose Mens Citadel jackets online sale Denmark Canada, UK,
    cheap Goose Expedition Parka coats online sale Denmark Canada, UK,
    canada goose snow mantra parka online sale Denmark Canada, UK,
    Canada Goose Yorkville Parka Jackets online sale Denmark Canada, UK,
    womens Goose Chilliwack Parka online sale Denmark Canada, UK,
    womens Goose Expedition Parka online sale Denmark Canada, UK,
    womens Goose Kensington Parka Jackets online sale Denmark Canada, UK,
    womens Goose Montebello Parka jackets online sale Denmark Canada, UK,
    Canada Goose Womens Solaris Parka online sale Denmark Canada, UK.

    ReplyDelete