That may sound like a reasonable approach. I see some unintended consequences. From the WSJ:
Creditors of euro-zone countries that face insolvency after 2013 will see their bond holdings restructured.
Okay, we get that. After 2013 holders of bonds of troubled countries get hit. But what happens between now and 2013? Again from the Journal:
Ms. Merkel has stressed in that the proposal would affect only bonds issued from late 2013.
Wait a second. If bonds issued after late 2013 are at risk, does that mean that bonds issued before 2013 are not at risk? That sure is what it sounds like to me.
The bond market is going to call this bluff. There are Greek, Irish and Spanish bonds that are trading at 9%, 7% and 5% respectively that are the buy of a lifetime if I am reading this right. Who wouldn’t want to buy a nice 9%, ten-year Greek bond that was also guaranteed as to payment by the big hitters of the EU? A “fully” guaranteed bond would trade closer to 3% than 9%.
So I am left confused by this development. Other questions:
-If the “at risk” provisions for all existing EU sovereign debt is somehow eliminated you have to ask; who is making the promise that all that debt is money good? The ECB? I would think not. We are talking of a few trillion Euros if you add in Spain and Italy. You need a big stick to guarantee that nut.
-What the hell is going to happen in 2013? By setting a “date certain” situation where the status of a borrower changes from one day to the next is just begging for a crisis. Depending on the circumstances one of the countries could be blocked out of the credit market overnight. This plan is a set-up for failure, not success.
It’s possible that I (and the Journal) are reading this wrong. We shall see. It will show up in bond prices and CDS spreads. This could also be something that later gets clarified. That will be interesting. The headline for that might be:
Merkel Changes Direction“Current Debt Not Secure”


I just finished reading Ed Hugh's analysis of the Greek situation at his Fistful of Euro's blog. It is really grim in terms of Greece ever
ReplyDeletebeing able to get out of its growth/debt spiral.
This suggests more can kicking in terms of IMF/EU extensions on repayment to avoid default. However, as you note the Germans are not keen, to put it mildly, on extending these
bailouts beyond 2013 but even if they agree to extensions on repayment that does nothing to fix the problem. In fact, if growth and revenues don't improve, it only makes for more
debt to default on when default comes.
You think the Irish people will accept the austerity package, and pass the budget on Dec. 7?
ReplyDeleteGL
GL, Yes I do. I don't think it would have gotten this far unless the "votes" were there. The Irish people have no vote in this. If they did they would vote against it.
ReplyDeleteBK, some breaking news: http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/breaking/2010/1129/breaking11.html
ReplyDeleteOpposition parties in Ireland are likely to vote the budget down—and the bailout along with it.
GL