You don’t get it. Bernanke is giving you a once in a lifetime opportunity. He’s writing a put under the market. You’ll never see Dow 10,000 again. What the Fed is doing is a “good” thing.
This guy is coining money on the prospect of QE, he will probably rake in more when it is a reality. We shall see if this all works out, but one can’t argue the fact that from his perspective QE=Good. There are so many things that we contemplate as being “good” when in fact they are really not good. To me, saying,” QE is good” is like saying. “War is good for the Economy”.
-It is Good when the US pursues a beggar my neighbor policy of trashing the dollar. It is Bad when China manipulates its currency however.
-Laisse-Faire economics is Bad, Keynesian economics is Good.
-Price discovery is Bad, mark to model is Good.
-Balanced budgets and paygo are Bad, deficits are Good.
-ZIRP is Good for the economy, saving is Bad.
-A no downside risk equity market is Good. Bubbles however are very Bad.
-The Fed forcing inflation is Good. It would be Bad if prices were stable or went down.
-That QE and ZIRP undermine the dollar is good. When oil goes to $100 that would be Bad.
At the end of the day QE is going to raise the cost of living for every American. We face the double hit of homegrown and imported inflation due to the collapse of the dollar. The vast majority of Americans will be poorer as a result. But some fat cats earning 2&20 will make a bundle in a rigged market. QE will put the mother of all hurts on us at some point in the future. But for now it is a Good thing. And therefore we need more of it. And we’re certain to get it.
We need some leadership that cuts through the crap. It makes no sense to follow a reckless and dangerous policy that has the objective of enriching such a small portion of the population. The downside risks are large. We are in completely uncharted waters with monetary policy. The Fed is making a “Grand Experiment” with absolutely no consent from the people.
We can only hope that the next election brings a sea change of thinking. That would appear to be unlikely. While it is now certain that the “Ins” will be “Out” I don’t see a single voice in those who will step into leadership that is apposed to QE. Until that happens Bernanke will continue to brush off the warnings (from other Fed board members) and plod down a road that he is espousing as Good, even though he knows full well that it is Bad.


Krugman recommends $8-10T of QE to turn the deflationary tide. Prechter says 100T might do it. If BB's peashooter is only loaded with 1-2T, good luck. That won't even cover the amount of bad MBS that banks are going to eat.
ReplyDeleteBruce do you think the Chinese are trashing the USD so our friends will be pissed at us at the Nov meeting and take heat off them?
ReplyDeleteFrazier-Lemke II anybody ?
ReplyDeletehttp://themeanoldinvestor.blogspot.com/2010/10/frazier-lemke-ii.html
Amen. Couldn't have said it better.
ReplyDeleteDavid,
ReplyDeleteThe Chinese are not trashing the dollar. Bernanke is.
Anon 6:56
ReplyDeleteKrugman is an asshole but even he dos not want 10T in QE. He wants a deficit package, not a monetary solution. We would never get to 5T in QE. We would blowup and die well before we got there.
Well said.
ReplyDeleteI probably will get egged for this but... some amount of QE2 is necessary. The Fed MBS portfolio is getting repaid a little every day. So the balance sheet is shrinking which means defacto tightening which is not good.
ReplyDeleteI figure Bullard is probably right, best not to do things all at once. Expand the footings by $300Bln which should correct the implicit shrinkage and then some. After that wait.
BTW I also think it might be good to lift the Fed Funds rate a bit which will give some help to savers. It's what Bagehot said, lend as much as needed, but don't lend for free which is a giveway to the banks. They have had enough free drinks.
“the paper mark totally collapsed in value against foreign currencies and gold, which encouraged wild speculation on the foreign exchange and stock markets, during which smart operators and large industrial groups accumulated large fortunes at the expense of small savers and the working class…
ReplyDeleteIn the meantime, an index of German share prices (1913 = 100) rose from 126 in January 1918 to 531,300,000 in September 1923, and to 23,680,000 million in November 1923 amidst extremely high volatility. (In dollar terms, because of the currency depreciation, the same index (1913 = 100) fell from 101.55 in January 1918 to 2.72 in October 1922, before recovering to 39.36 in November 1923.) The extremely high volatility of the stock market is a typical feature of hyperinflating economies.”
– Marc Faber, The Financial Implications of Reflation, 2004