Googleanalytics

Friday, October 15, 2010

Ben Lied

Over the years a good number of speeches by our leaders have been marked by history. Abe said, “Four score…”, Jack said, Ask not…”, George said, “Mission accomplished…” I think we got more of those memorable worlds today from Bernanke. His comments will be remembered like George’s. They will stick in our minds and thoughts for decades. And like George’s words, history will prove them to be a lie. Ben’s lies will cost us trillions, and quite possibly our way of life. His lie:

I am confident that the FOMC will be able to tighten monetary conditions when warranted, even if the balance sheet remains considerably larger than normal at that time.

How could he possibly be “confident” that this can be done? It has never been done before. No sane man can make such a promise when there is no history to guide us. Bernanke is sane, therefore I conclude that he is lying to us on this critical fact.

What economic environment would exist when “conditions warrant tightening”? That’s simple to forecast. If inflation goes above 4% in any 12 month period or averages above 3% in 24 months they would have to tighten. Bernanke thinks he can sell a few trillion in Bonds in that environment? Not a chance in hell. If the Fed said, “From now on we will be selling 100b a month” the bond market would fold. Long-term interest rates would pass 5% in months. 6% mortgages and competition for credit from the private sector would collapse the economy.

Bernanke is an academic who studied the Great Depression. He has never sat on a bond desk. He has no idea what it is like when the holders of your paper say, “No mas”. He thinks that because there is an insatiable demand for fixed income today the same conditions will exist when tightening is required. He says he is confident of that. Not possible.

For me the Grand Experiment of QE rests on the issue, “Can we get out this?” If that is in doubt (as I strongly believe) then the policy can only be viewed as a reckless gamble. Before Bernanke pulls the trigger he needs to convince me and many others that his confidence is justified. I want to hear some thoughts from others on this issue. I want to hear from Brian Sack at the NY Fed. It is he who will have to execute what Bernanke is so confident about. He would never soft sell that risk. He knows full well that it can’t be done without the possibility of a spectacular blowup. He would never use the word “confident”.

I want to hear from the primary dealers and the likes of PIMCO. Put them on a stand in D.C. and ask if they are confident that this can be accomplished. Not one would. Get some former Treasury Secretaries to opine. I would like to hear from Greenspan. NO ONE would say they are confident on the outcome. I want to see just one credible source chime in with Bernanke on this. Just one.

Bernanke put his reputation on the line with his “confident” remark. How can anyone be so certain about an uncertain future?


7 comments:

  1. He's probably asking himself 'What choice do I have?', or 'What choice do we have?'. His answer seems to be 'None'. And since he sees QE-2 as imperative, it's up to him to sell it.

    It's a sad spectacle. As you wrote earlier, at some level he and everyone involved must know it is wrong ('Bad').

    Markets have a surreal feel at the moment. Earnings going well enough I suppose.

    ReplyDelete
  2. But What do I Know?October 15, 2010 10:00 AM

    Amen again! You're on fire today, BK. My day will be complete if you can comment on the fact that the Fed keeps claiming that QE reduces long-term yields when it appears to do the exact opposite. (look at what the 30-year has done since August and what it did the first time they announced it in Dec 08.)

    As they say, he lies like a finance minister on the eve of devaluation. . .

    ReplyDelete
  3. Big "opening" get together in Augusta this weekend. All the top banksters and their retired mentors will be there and no guests are allowed. I have heard they all get together in one corner during the cocktail hour and compare notes. What do you think they will decide to tell BB?

    ReplyDelete
  4. Interesting locale for the bankster get-together this weekend, given that Ben (no hanky-panky) Bernanke was born in Augusta, Georgia on Dec. 13, 1953. If I were a bankster I would be raising a glass in honour of Bernanke and Obama, the former for making the bail-out happen, the latter for not making them do the richly deserved perp walk. Unbelievable that these creeps still walk among us.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Bernanke is a liar and a money printer
    http://fatboysez.blogspot.com/2010/10/bernanke-is-liar-and-money-printer.html

    ReplyDelete
  6. The problems begin before anyone gets to the 'selling' part.

    Buying bonds from the Treasury means Ben isn't buying something else. That 'something else' is what is keeping the markets afloat and participants patiently lined up @ the exits.

    Bernanke has little choice as deflation makes the current debt levels unsupportable - both public and private. It's monetize or default.

    He will gamble triggering a run which would propel bonds higher.

    That and oil prices keep me awake at night (although it looks as if oil prices are ready to roll over so the entire issue is academic).

    ReplyDelete
  7. George never said "Mission Accomplished." Making a statement like that is either ignorant or willfully false. You get a second chance with ignorance.

    ReplyDelete