The SSTF has (finally) released its June trading results. June is a big month for the Fund. Every June they aggregate all of their cash positions and reinvest the proceeds in newly issued securities with maturities from one to fifteen-years. There a few observations I would like to make regarding these results. First a look at the trading blotter. I will reuse sections of this report later on so don’t get hung up now on these big numbers.
There were a total of 36 separate transactions during the month. Not a big deal for your average day trader. But consider the size of these deals. The total turnover for the month was $612 Billion. That ain’t hay. The total assets held by the Fund were about $2.6 T so SS turned over the equivalent of 25% of its book in just one month. Two observations:
-I constantly see reports in the media on SS that argue that there is no money in the TF. That the assets are not real. That there is no liquidity in the securities held by the Fund. That it is a Ponzi accounting scam. A look at the June results prove that those claims are all false. The extreme naysayers of SS should look at this and wake up. These are very real assets. They are liquid.
-From the CBO to other government officials to Wall Street and most other economists we are getting a measure of the nations debt that is a function of the Debt Held by the Public. The CBO thinks our debt is 53% of GDP because they conveniently forget about the intergovernmental accounts (where SS fits in). The total IG account is $4.5T and has trust funds that are comprised substantially of special issue treasury securities.
Both sides of this need to wake up and smell the coffee. These debts are very real. They are legally as binding as those securities held by the Chinese Central Bank. When we talk about our debt these should be included. Our debt is not 53% of GDP. It is 92%. Debate over.
The Fund acquired a strip of newly issues securities with its excess cash. The maturities range from 1-15 years. As you can see from the following the entire $270 billion of new investments was set at one common rate of 2-7/8%. This is the arithmetic average of all Treasury maturities beyond four years. What this means is that the TF is immune from the investment death trap of ZIRP. Consider the first investment of $14.996 billion with a maturity of one year. The fund gets a return of 2-7/8 on that. The fair market rate was just 25bb. The difference on this one transaction? It comes to a tidy $395mm. Who would not like a risk free investment and earn 2-5/8 over market? I would love to buy into that. But this “special deal” is only available to the TFs. Why is it that they get such a good return?
-I conclude that the TF is costing us much more than just the payroll taxes that are collected. To get a real sense of the cost you have to add in the interest. Our economy has to pay that as well. The total interest tab in 2010 will be ~$118 billion. The average yield on the portfolio is 4.7%. The recent fair market rate on an eight-year average life Treasury investment would be about 2.2%. The Fund is enjoying an above market yield of 2.5% currently. That comes to $63 billion a year. The formula that sets the interest rates is now 50 years old. It should be reviewed. It is no longer a viable methodology. Our short term financial position is being impaired so that SS can “look better” long term. We are kidding ourselves.
The flip side of this is that the Fund's % income is declining even with the formula that beefs up its results. Look at all the high coupon stuff that has rolled off. The folks at the TF must be sad to see these bonds mature. They have been living off of this fat income for years. Consider the $29.7b of 5.5% bonds the Fund has been holding for fifteen-years. That money was re-invested at 2-7/8%. The difference over the next 15 years comes to a whopping $800mm per year or a total loss of revenue of $11 billion. And that is just one small portion. The bonds that came due and a graph of the interest rates the fund has realized in the past:
The Fund has projected that this rate will return to 6% on average. I don’t think they consulted with Ben Bernanke on this. Ben is going to keep rates at artificially low levels for years. Even though the Fund benefits from a dumb 50-year old formula their revenues are going down. In a few years the numbers will be off “plan” and people will be scratching their heads wondering why.
The TF receives interest from Treasury in December and June. For June it was $59B. They will get a similar number in December. So for the full year % will be $118b. The assets of the Fund will rise in the year by about $80b. This is the fundamental problem with the Fund. They are losing money in their operations, but still show a growing surplus due to interest income. But we know that the interest is (A) declining and (B) it is artificially supported by a half century old methodology.
In June the Fund took in $56.8 billion in payroll taxes. They paid out $63.1 billion in benefits (includes $4.4 B of RR benefits). This is the only number you need to know. On a cash basis the Fund is losing billions every month. For June it was $6.3b. The interest income that hides this problem is just noise.
For the record; my numbers for July, August and September. It comes to a shortfall of $21 for the Q. By way of comparison Q3 2007 was in surplus by $10.6B. And some say the Fund has not “turned the corner”. Another thing we are kidding ourselves about.
July: +50.9 (PR), -58.7 (benefits). Net: -7.8B
August: +50.9 (PR), -58.6 (benefits). Net: -7.7B
September: +53 (PR), 58.8 (benefits). Net: -5.8B
Wednesday, September 1, 2010
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)






This is great analysis, thanks. BTW, you have probably noticed that SSTF has stopped posting their revenues in advance (i.e., you used to be able to get June's number--an estimate, obviously--in May). Any thoughts on why this might be--is it related to the "missing" money you posted on earlier?
ReplyDelete#That the assets are not real
ReplyDeleteBruce,
no offense, always liked you comments , but you got carried away a bit..
you believe cauise some kind web page says so.. please,, you 're better than that..
just simple check.. can you prove it by find out COUNTERPARTIES in this deals.. anyone ?
alx
WIK:
ReplyDeleteThis does not connect to the miscounted $25b.
I looked at the PR to make a guess on the actually monthly NFP numbers. I wrote about it. SS may have read it and concluded they should not give the #s out.
I was never able to use it as a viable forecasting tool. But some smart guy could have figured it out.
alx:
ReplyDeleteThe fund has its set of books and treasury has another set of books. You can look up the treasury report for the 1st day of the month. So there is another set of public books re these transactions. There are auditors and bean counters all over this.
Now you could say that the whole thing is just a scam and and both Treasury and SS and a few thousand other folks are in on the scam.
I don't think that is the case. Fraud is not the problem. Bad economics is.
Hey Bruce,
ReplyDeleteI like your blog and read it regularly. I think you have a unique perspective -- 'take' -- to offer.
I constantly see reports in the media on SS that argue that there is no money in the TF.
But I must say this is one of the more ridiculous and intellectually dishonest comebacks to critics of SS that I have ever seen.
The problem with SS is not that its assets do not exist or are not liquid -- are not 'real' if you want to put it that way. The problem is that they represent obligations of taxpayers. This money -- principal and interest -- has to come from (the federal government's) general revenue. Meaning it has to be sucked out of the economy; it has to be sucked out of the pockets of future taxpayers.
@BK: Apparently someone at SSTF is reading your blog--I suppose that's a good thing. Next thing you know you might get invited to a meeting at the Treasury, lol.
ReplyDeleteI don't think you are right - the reason that the portfolio has a higher yield than the market currently is because it IS a portfolio. So a lot of the assets have higher than market yields. The only reason for the whole portfolio to yield 2.2% is if it went out and bought the entire portfolio now. As old assets roll off the yield will drop, just like a normal fixed income portfolio. I think in terms of ranting about "above market" yields, you are barking up the wrong tree. On your wider point that the whole fund is probably in a whole world of trouble, I would tend to agree but I am not familiar with the SSTF.
ReplyDeleteYou mention how SS benefits from its higher than market interest rates on TF holdings but hasn't the government also 'shot itself in the foot' through ZIRP.
ReplyDeleteWhile tens of millions of people pay no income
taxes they do have money witheld from their paychecks. One would think this would be well in excess of a trillion dollar interest free loan every year for the government.
You seem to enjoy looking into government funding issues. Any ideas of how ZIRP has impacted government revenue.
Scott Angell
Pete D.
ReplyDeleteSS is a fixed coupon investor and is riding the long term decline in rates. That is one reason why the have such a rich yielding book.
The other reason is they have no risk to the short end. The formula has protected them. They did not get hurt like everyone else when Greenspan did a mini Zirp. They are getting 2-7/8 for cash today. Look through the last years results from the site I highlighted. It is big bucks.
So SS plays with a stacked deck. This means there is a hidden subsidy. We ought to understand that.
This means there is a hidden subsidy.
ReplyDeleteThe question is, who is bearing the cost of this "subsidy"?
They are getting 2-7/8 for cash today.
By today's standard that's pretty good. But it's just an accident -- they never managed their holdings with the intent to out-earn. It's just a consequence of today's interest rate environment.
But really, compared to the nature of the whole Ponzi scheme (and this characterization is wholly justified), is that really something for anyone to hang their hat on?
All right, Madoff! Where did you get the idea of paying early investors with money from late investors?...From the social security system.
I hope you'll keep writing about SS.